Entrepreneur
par passion
Entrepreneur
par passion
Brumm: Every diversified business model has the potential for conflicts of interest. The important thing is to identify and eliminate them before they become a problem. In our case, this occurs simply because our top managers hold interests at the individual company level and, in addition, because we have external investors like Credit Suisse and AXA on board for our two listed companies, Altira and Aragon. This ensures proper risk controlling and proper internal allocation of costs.
Angermayer: The desire to change things and help shape the world.
Lange: In the coming decades we want to make a sustainable contribution to the further development of the German business landscape and become involved as entrepreneurs in our home market socially, culturally, and politically. Purely financial investors are not in a position to do so because, for that, you need a long-term time horizon, focussing not just on pure profit maximisation but rather on the quest for the equality of interests of all stakeholders.
Angermayer: We have achieved a great deal at this point, but we see all of this as just the starting phase in our development. The financial sector is an especially volatile industry, and this also applies to the individuals involved. Many change their jobs every two years. We have been working together for ten years now, and will likely continue to do so for the rest of our professional lives. Even though we are entirely different in terms of character and personal strengths and weaknesses, we know that we can rely on each other completely. At the same time, our respect for each other allows us to actively discuss issues and come to the best decision without internal politics.
Dr. Grabmaier: We have a passion for being entrepreneurs. We are happy that we can share this passion with a growing number of colleagues – executive board members and key employees in our companies, as well as longstanding business partners – and that we have formed deep friendships and partnerships in the process. This applies, in particular, to our most important capital partner, the Silvia Quandt family, which also holds an interest in a number of our companies. In the end, it is always the interpersonal relationships that give value to life, and this includes, in particular, one’s professional life.
Brumm: Let me first give a positive answer to this. We have always taken care only to pursue projects and make investments whose failure, while perhaps painful, would never have seriously endangered the entire group or even a portion of it. In this respect, we are very risk averse, and this has saved us from committing serious errors quite often in the last ten years, regardless of how favourable and enticing a transaction might have appeared at the start.
Dr. Grabmaier: We have naturally made quite a few mistakes over the last ten years, but never a “big one”. If we did a mistake, often the core of the problem invariably had to do with an incorrect personal assessment. It is, after all, the people involved who represent the crucial factor in converting an idea into success. We invested in a number of promising companies that had a good idea, but lacked the management needed to realise its potential. However, we also invested in companies whose business idea turned out in retrospect not to be as viable as we had originally thought, but whose management nevertheless, through determination, creativity and entrepreneurial spirit, made it a success. As was said previously, it is people who give value to life.
Angermayer: The financial industry is not an industry where one normally starts his own company. Instead, it is actually very “non-”entrepreneurial. For more than 100 years, the industry has developed in a way that has pushed family and owner-managed banks to the sidelines, replacing them with large corporations that are led by managers and are generally stock-exchange listed. I believe that this is also one of the more deeply-rooted reasons for the current desolate state of our industry. We personally firmly believe that the best decisions are made when risk and return form a meaningful unit, that is, when the person receiving the return also bears the corresponding risk. This individual will then think through all of the consequences of his decisions. This was no longer the case for many companies lacking entrepreneurially active shareholders. It was possible for managers to receive high returns in the form of bonuses, without having to bear the corresponding risk. Simply stated, the situation gave them an invitation to gamble according to classical “agency theory”. I would venture to say that the banks would have behaved differently if they had still been traditional partnerships, where the responsible parties also personally would have to bear any losses. There is a reason why, for example, the owner-managed banks in Switzerland are still in very good condition.
Brumm: Unfortunately, yes. And everyone, politicians, entrepreneurs and bankers, must now work against this. So far, the market economy has basically always learned from previous crises and become better as a result. Although it is the best economic model that we have, it is also far from being perfect. The failure of all of the other models has proven to be far more impressive, with significantly more painful consequences. This will also be the case this time. Progress is basically learning through crisis. In addition, politicians should never forget that a free market economy is one of the foundations of democracy. I would even go so far as to say that a market economy is a precondition for democracy, although, as successfully shown by China to date, the Western form of democracy is not a precondition for a market economy. Do you think there is a danger that the concept of free market economy and enterprise has been harmed by the financial crisis?